Sunday, October 19, 2014

A critcal response to a critic

If you wish to order The Coming of the Quantum Christ:
CreateSpace
A hard copy full color version can be order from CreateSpace:

Smashwords
There are eight different formats that you can download on Smashwords and actually read a free sample.
Epub can be read by Nook and Adobe Digital Editions.  Mobi can be read by Kindle.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As an author, I suppose that I should not be too sensitive to criticisms. It comes with the territory. However, Hugh Farey's  criticism posted on shroudstory.com that I did not devote enough space and energy to explaining why Picknett-Prince theory that DaVinci forged the Shroud 100 years after it was first exhibited in Lirey, France is nearly as supercilious as the theory itself (which Hugh apparently rejects also).

The complete first paragraph of Chapter One which Hugh cites in part reads:

"There have been more than 1,000 books written about the Shroud of Turin from many different perspectives. Some claim to have determined that the Shroud of Turin is a fake. Many of those insist that it was painted, the usual suspect being Leonardo da Vinci. It has even been claimed that the Shroud is a photograph created by da Vinci who managed to insert his own face onto the cloth.[i] That is fiction. Da Vinci was born approximately 100 years after the first documented exhibition of the Shroud in Lirey France. Although the clearly documented history of the Shroud dates to 1350 CE and its exposition at Lirey, there are various accounts which would indicate its existence at much earlier times." (Emphasis added)

I think that given the fatuousness of the Pinkett-Prince theory, that was enough.

Quantum Christ is not a book about "wingnut" theories.[ii] It focuses on the physical facts of the Shroud and the inferences that can be drawn from those facts. If anyone has any need to research deeply into their wingnut theory there are ample resources on the web. Let me suggest one:  http://www.shroud-enigma.com/investigation/Forger/Forger-shroud.htm

There have been two comments published thus far on the Amazon Page for Quantum Christ. One was a five out of five star review and the other was four out of five by Judith Underwood.

Ms. Underwood's review was enlightening and helpful to me:
"Excellent account of the history of Shroud research and presents a very good case for its authenticity! I was a bit disappointed that it did not delve into how the findings of quantum physics may provide a possible mechanism for the image formation."

I will be preparing a revision to answer Ms. Underwood's comment and if anyone has already purchased the book, I will provide the revision gratis. Actually, the revision of the one chapter will include a discussion of a 2010 presentation by Andrew Sullivan and Nigel Kerner[iii] which argues that consciousness was an elemental power that along with gravity pre-existed the universe and engendered it. That's my very brief summary and/or conclusion.

I was drawn to the presentation by a remark by Dr. Silverman at the recent St. Louis Conference just concluded that conscious was a preexisting force as was gravity. (My interpretation).

That's a "wow" philosophically speaking.

Let's see, consciousness that along with gravity that preexisted in what I have labeled the "cosmic chaos" from which our universe emerged. None dare call it God.





[i] Picknett, Lynn; Prince, Clive L, Turin Shroud: In Whose Image? The Shocking Truth Unveiled, BloomsburyLondon, 1994.
[ii] I am afraid that "wingnut" may be an "Americanism" like "wanting something in the worst way." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wingnut_(politics)

No comments:

Post a Comment