Showing posts with label Christ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christ. Show all posts

Sunday, July 26, 2015

The God of Probability: The Shroud and Divine Providence

Providence and the Shroud

The fact that the Shroud has survived for more than nearly two millennia is virtually inexplicable. In the course of those millennia on many occasions it survived dire circumstances, narrowly escaping destruction.

The empty Shroud was first noted in the tomb by Peter and from that moment on we have conflicting reports of its location. The Shroud had to be kept a secret initially because as a relic of the crucified Christ it would be a prime object for seizure by both Roman and Jewish authorities. Later, iconoclastic movements would have made short work of it. It appears to have been hidden in the city of Edessa for some time. Eventually, Edessa came under control of a Muslim ruler.

In 944, it was wrested from Muslim control by a Byzantine Army and brought to Constantinople. An eye witness account recorded its weekly exposition in Constantinople and its disappearance when French knights looted Constantinople of its treasures in 1204 CE.

Its disappearance from Constantinople was fortuitous because Constantinople would eventually fall to the Muslims. By that time the enmity between Christians and Muslims had become so severe that Sultan Bayazid I boasted that he would conquer Rome and feed his horses oats on the altar of St. Peters.

The Shroud was openly displayed in Lirey, a small French provincial town, in 1355 by the Geoffrey de Charny a French knight who claimed ownership of the Shroud. Neither he nor his descendants ever satisfactorily explained how he came into possession of the Shroud. In 1453, it was transferred by de Charny's granddaughter to Duke Louis I of the House of Savoy. Eventually, it found a permanent home in Turin under the protection of the Savoy's. While the Shroud was safely ensconced in Turin two events that swept through much of Europe were leading to the destruction of many Catholic relics. One was the Protestant Reformation. John Calvin was particularly disturbed by the Catholic veneration of the Shroud. He never got his hands on it.

The second event was the French Revolution of the late eighteenth century. When it was operating at full throttle, many Catholic relics and icons were fed to revolutionary bonfires.

Another narrow escape for the Shroud occurred in World War II. The Vatican was fearful for the fate of the Shroud and sought to hide it for the duration of the war. It was brought from Turin to Rome and initially it was proposed that it be hidden in the Monastery at Monte Casino. However, it was finally decided to choose a less conspicuous place, the smaller Benedictine Abbey of Montevergine, in the province of Avellino, northeast of Naples. Had the Shroud been secreted at Monte Casino it would most likely have been destroyed by the massive Allied bombing of Monte Casino in 1944.

In 1532 at Chambray, October 1972 in Turin, and a second time in Turin on April 11, 1997, the Shroud was threatened with destruction by fire and yet survived. Evidence of arson was found in an investigation of the 1997 incident.

The late John Heller who along with Alan Adler was responsible for the analysis of the blood stains on the Shroud noted that throughout the STURP testing of the Shroud: "The role of 'coincidence' was awesome." (Heller, Dr. John H., p. 221 Report on the Shroud of Turin Houghton Mifflin, 1983)

Divine Providence

But was the survival of the Shroud merely luck and were "coincidences" just happenstance ‑ or were they evidence of the intervention of Divine Providence?

According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, providence may be defined as the practical reason, adapting means to an end. As applied to God, Divine Providence is God Himself considered in that act by which in His wisdom He so orders all events within the universe that the end for which it was created may be realized. (Providence, Catholic Encyclopedia, http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12510a.htm accessed July 23, 2015)

The hypothesis this I advance is that the accumulation of circumstances and events concerning the Shroud and its escapes from destruction may be attributable to divine intervention.

Teilhard placed Divine Providence at the center of creation:

"In the centre, so glaring as to be disconcerting, is the uncompromising affirmation of a personal God: God as providence, directing the universe with loving, watchful care; and God the revealer, communicating himself to man on the level of and through the ways of intelligence." (de Chardin, Pierre Teilhard (2011-06-21). The Phenomenon Of Man (Kindle Locations 5383-5387). Evergreen Books. Kindle Edition.  Paperback Edition, pp 292-293 First Harper Colophon Edition 1975 (Reprinted in Perennial 2002)

However, when it came to a specific intervention Divine Providence (such as we hypothesize for the survival of the Shroud) Teilhard is circumspect:

"Yet, whatever inner evidence we may have on this matter (and such evidence is perhaps much more certain than any reasoning), we cannot but recognize that the objectivity of such special or general interventions by Providence into our lives falls into the category of personal intuition rather than into that of the demonstrable." (Emphasis added)

Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre (2002-11-18). Christianity and Evolution (Harvest Book, Hb 276) (Kindle Locations 2140-2144). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Kindle Edition.

Providence and Probability

Science never stands still. Teilhard passed away in 1955. In the past 60 years science has expanded its reach into areas that in the past were beyond investigation by the scientific method. One of those the nature of consciousness in general, and among other things the nature of intuition which has been defined as "sub-conscious reasoning." The computer is a good vehicle for explaining the difference between consciousness reasoning and sub-conscious reasoning. Conscious reasoning is akin to information on a physical hard drive that must be called-up from the hard dive by the processor. Subconscious reasoning is like random access memory which can process information at blinding speed because there is no physical interaction necessary.

Intuition is a process which is pure thought and there is no need to access the conscious brain. Information is considered and utilized at blinding speed and appears to be instantaneous. Two recent works that discuss this phenomenon are BlinkThe Power of Thinking Without Thinking  by Malcolm Gladwell and Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious   by Gerd Gigerenzer

There is one item that all of us factor into our intuition: the law of probability. That doesn't mean we are always right because our sense of the probabilities may be askew. Yet, it is possible to analyze the probabilities of a particular situation and arrive at a mathematical solution. Our subconscious does that intuitively.

In 2009 there was an election in Iran. The "gut feeling" or intuition was that it was rigged. That intuition was confirmed by a study of the election returns. The hypothesis was that absent human intervention (i.e. fraud), the last digit of each report would be a random number evenly dispersed from 0 to 9. The last digits of the election results reported from each district were not evenly dispersed. The application of the law of probability supported the intuition of fraud.

See The God of Probabilities: How voting fraud in Iran demonstrates the existence of God.

What the digits revealed is human intervention in the recording of the results that skewed them.

Given all the crisis visited on the Shroud, what are the odds that it would have survived? Our intuition is that Providence intervened to insure its survival to modern times  ‑ when science had developed to a stage that could unlock its revelation.

That is of course only a hypothesis – for now.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Coming of the Quantum Christ is available for order either as E-Book and four color print edition. You can get a 15% discount on the print edition.
 .


Tuesday, June 23, 2015

The Pope, the Apocalypse and the Shroud


On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Pope Francis released to the world his groundbreaking encyclical on climate change Laudato Si. On Sunday, June 21, he prayed before the Shroud of Turin and then standing-up moved forward and tenderly touched the rim of the Shroud's display frame. Both the release of Laudato Si on  June 18 and his travel to Turin had been publicized months in advance. Could they have been related?



"Groundbreaking" understates the importance of Laudato Si. There have been five mass extinctions of species in the history of earth. One of them, the Permian, nearly extinguished all life.

Concerns about climate change have been building for decades. In the first five months of 2014, an avalanche of reports was issued which again highlighted the problems and the dire consequences of inaction. It may already be too late. The reports supported the conclusion of Elizabeth Kolbert and Richard Leakey that the sixth mass extinction was underway and while its furthest extent could not yet be limned, one species in peril is  humanity.

The Pontifical Academy of Science and Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences (PAS/PASS) sponsored a workshop on “Sustainable Humanity, Sustainable Nature” in Rome from May 4-May 6, 2014. Among the 57 participants was Nobel Laureate Paul Crutzen. [i]

Crutzen is a Dutch Chemist who shared the Nobel Prize for his discovering the effects of ozone-depleting compounds.[ii] Crutzen also named the current geological era, the “Anthropocene,” a not necessarily honorable honorific for humanity. Until approximately 200 years ago, humanity was believed to have little impact on the geologic eras but that changed:[iii]

“The Anthropocene could be said to have started in the late eighteenth century, when analyses of air trapped in polar ice showed the beginning of growing global concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane.”[iv]

It its May 6, 2014 final conference statement, the scientists noted among other things:

“Human action which is not respectful of nature becomes a boomerang for human beings that creates inequality and extends what Pope Francis has termed "the globalization of indifference" and the "economy of exclusion" (Evangelii Gaudium), which themselves endanger solidarity with present and future generations.”[v]

After the conference, it was rumored that Francis intended to write an encyclical about climate change and its moral and ethical impact on humanity.[vi] Environmentalists, scientists, public officials, and academics from a variety of institutions awaited its publication.

The Yale Forestry and Divinity schools sponsored a panel discussion on the impact of the anticipated encyclical. It may be viewed on the web.[vii] The participants included not just Christians but a woman who works on environmental issues with Buddhist monks in Nepal. All were enthusiastically awaiting not just the encyclical but also the pope's follow-up addresses to the US Congress and the United Nations. The Pope's ultimate goal was clearly to influence the UN Conference on climate change scheduled for Paris in December. That conference may be humanity's last clear chance to avoid total climate disaster.

On June 18th, the Vatican published Laudato Si. Yet there is a word missing from Laudato Si, a word which better than any expresses an ancient and persistent fear of humanity that applies to the projected results of the climate change engendered by the sixth mass extinction: Apocalypse. Understandably, Pope Francis shunned the  use of apocalyptic reference. Francis avoids criticism that he is a hysterical alarmist.

However, the unfortunate fact is that we are starting down the path that may lead to an apocalyptic extinction of the humanity. In fact, the early stages of the sixth mass extinction of life exhibits signs that it may be the last. Forces are being unleashed that may make the Earth inhospitable to any conscious life and perhaps any life at all.

On January 17, 2015, the New York Times published an Op-Ed by astrophysicist Adam Frank who believes that mass extinctions of life are a natural result of the evolution of conscious life forms that as they develop abuse the environment as a matter of course. The nearly inevitable result is the extinction of all life. It's a scenario that he hypothesizes has been repeated millions of time on planets throughout the Universe.

Listen! Can you hear the hoof beats? The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse are riding. They are just over the horizon.

In  Evangelii Gaudium, Francis excoriated the selfishness of those whose claim faith in blind market forces that they manipulate for their own selfish interests. In Laudato Si, he doesn't completely connect the dots. Nonetheless, the Apocalypse we face is an Apocalypse of Selfishness.

Perhaps it is no accident that Francis' trip to Turin and planned visit to the Shroud followed so closely the publication of Laudato Si. Given the ferocious criticism he received and no doubt anticipated from reactionary forces in the Church and elsewhere, he needed a moment with the Shroud. I can only suspect that as he prayed, he was offering-up of Laudato Si to the God made man to whom he has dedicated his life. If so, I pray that his prayer was answered:

"Well done, good and faithful servant."

Mathew 25:21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn about The Coming of the Quantum Christ






[ii] Elizabeth Kolbert, The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History (Henry Holt, New York, 2014)
[iii] Paul Crutzen, Nature 415, 3 January 2002. (cited hereafter as “Crutzen)
[iv] Crutzen, supra.
[v] Statement of the Joint PAS/PASS Workshop on Sustainable Humanity, Sustainable Nature, May 6, 2014 (http://www.pass.va/content/scienzesociali/en/events/2014-18/sustainable/statement.html)

Thursday, May 21, 2015

The Blind men, the Elephant and the Shroud of Turin

If you are interested in  my book the Coming of the Quantum Christ you will find details at my Living Free blog.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As I have written, more than once, I find the community skeptical of the Shroud of Turin much like the blind men and the elephant. This morning, exasperated as usual by the "experts," who seek to cram the issue of Shroud authenticity in their area of expertise (like the art historian who claims to have solved the "mystery" of the image) I decided to do a little (very) research. My view is that there are three general disciplines with subgroups that must be addressed and an approach founded on only one or two of them will always come-up short: Religion, History and Science. Perhaps I should admit to a personal bias in that grouping because on graduation from high school, I won the gold medals in all three and although I did not pursue a career in science and religion, they have remained a life long interest. I have kept current.

It was 50 years ago that I had a moment of doubt about my faith in the existence of God when I learned that all of existence at the quantum level was subject to the law of probabilities. I resolved that issue intellectually when I asked myself the question: whose law is the law of probability? Why should cosmic chaos be organized in any way? Eventually, I arrived at a definition of God as the "primordial consciousness" from which our existence sprang. 

Yet, when I say some understanding of Science, History and Religion is essential to study of the Shroud, I must confess to a somewhat impish self-indulgence.

Yet, I can not escape my observation that when I read and participate in discussions and debate about the Shroud, so many are either side of the authenticity side of the argument seem like blind men (and women) arguing about the nature of an elephant. This morning I did a little research on the blind men issue and found on the web via Wikipedia the following couplet which is attributed to Buddha:

"O how they cling and wrangle, some who claim
For preacher and monk the honored name!
For, quarreling, each to his view they cling.
Such folk see only one side of a thing."

Jainism and Buddhism. Udana 68-69:
Parable of the Blind Men and the Elephant



Friday, October 17, 2014

Ebola, Protocols and the Shroud of Turin

The terrible fears engendered by the spread of Ebola have been caused in part by the insufficiency of the protocols for dealing with the disease. But instances of scientific failures engendered by the failure to promulgate, and abide by, effective protocols are not new. It’s the gravity of the Ebola plague that brings the issue front and center. Another example of failure to adopt and abide by sufficient protocols relates to the carbon dating of the Shroud of Turin.
Let’s not get ahead of the story – and the problem. First let’s look at the C-14 process and why it can be labeled a legitimate fiasco. To do that, we must look at the importance of protocols to scientific investigation for the errors of the C-14 process are directly linked to the issue of the use, or rather misuse, of appropriate protocols.
Excerpt from Chapter 10, The Coming of the Quantum Christ

The carbon dating of the Shroud will probably go down in history as one of the greatest fiascos in the history of science. It would make an excellent case study for any sociologist interested in exploring the ways in which science is affected by professional biases, prejudices and ambitions, not to mention religious (and irreligious) beliefs.”
Thomas de Wesselow[i]

Checklists, Protocols and Science
Anyone who has ever received medical treatment, whether at a doctor’s office or a hospital, has benefited from the use of checklists or protocols by their physicians or nurses. Protocols represent the required steps of any procedure, which experience has shown are necessary for the protection of a patient. At times, it may seem they are merely unnecessary red tape, but behind each step in a prescribed medical protocol there is usually a story, or often many stories, of things gone wrong if proper procedures were not followed.

Take the example of medicine gone awry when doctors in 1886, sought to treat bullet wound suffered by U. S. President James A. Garfield at the hands of Charles Guiteau.[ii] Today, medical experts are unanimous in the opinion that Garfield should have survived. Easily.

His death was caused by massive infections that finally battered his body into submission. From the outset, steps were taken that today would be unthinkable. Foremost perhaps, doctors probed for the assassin’s bullet without washing their hands. While the use of sterilized procedures had been instituted in Europe by then, such procedures had yet to take hold in the United States. Today, the steps taken to prevent infection are detailed in lengthy protocols; and medical personnel, whether in the doctor’s office or the hospital, violate those protocols at their own peril. It is unthinkable.

Another example where protocols save lives is aviation. Commercial airlines fly more than two billion passengers a year. The actions of the pilot and crew before take-off, during the flight and prior to landing are governed by checklists which are also protocols. Each individual airport will have procedures set forth in protocols to govern the take-off and landings of aircraft adjusted for the discrete circumstances of the particular airport and its environs.

As a result of the checklists and protocols, the number of commercial aviation deaths in any given year is but a minuscule fraction of the number of passengers carried. In 2011, 2.9 billion passengers traveled in commercial airlines and there were only 402 fatalities.[iii] That is .000000014 of a percent.[iv]

Protocols are also of utmost importance in scientific research. In the case of clinical trials for the testing of drugs and other medical procedures, including medical research, the World Health Organization has adopted a number of forms and recommended protocols.[v]
In the final analysis, the results of any scientific investigation can only be judged in light of its protocols. There are two fundamental questions: Were there adequate protocols and were the protocols followed in practice? If the answer to either of these questions is no, the results of the study are rendered unacceptable or futile.

There was, and may still be, a common belief that dating of the Carbon atom isotopes in an object is a fool proof scientific method of determining the age of an object. When it comes to the Shroud, nearly everybody wanted to carbon date the Shroud “in the worst way” and that is precisely what happened. The protocols were supposed to map the way to the truth. Instead, the truncated protocols adopted led the carbon scientists over a cliff.

You can read the whole story in Chapter 10 of  my book: The Coming of the Quantum Christ: The Shroud of Turin and the Apocalypse of Selfishness. It was published this month and is currently  available on available on KINDLE and  NOOK






[i] de Wesselow, Thomas, The Sign: The Shroud of Turin and the Secret of the Resurrection (p. 172). (Penguin Group New York, 2012) ( Cited hereafter as “de Wesselow”)
[ii] A President Felled by an Assassin and 1880’s Medical Care,” New York Times, July 25, 2006.
[iii] “Airplane deaths at record low in 2011: report,” N. Y. Daily News, January 1, 2011
[iv] 401 divided by .2,900,000,000.
[v] http://www.who.int/rpc/research_ethics/format_rp/en/index.html
[vi] de Wesselow, Thomas, The Sign: The Shroud of Turin and the Secret of the Resurrection (p. 172). (Penguin Group New York, 2012) ( Cited hereafter as “de Wesselow”)

Thursday, October 2, 2014

The Coming of the Quantum Christ

 If you wish to order The Coming of the Quantum Christ:
CreateSpace
A hard copy full color version can be order from CreateSpace:

Smashwords
There are eight different formats that you can download on Smashwords and actually read a free sample.
Epub can be read by Nook and Adobe Digital Editions.  Mobi can be read by Kindle.